RIR vs RPE in strength training

Two numbers for one question: how close to failure was that set? The scale, how to rate a set honestly, and how to turn the number into your next weight.

Written by Strengthara (Zenta AB) · Updated

RIR (reps in reserve) is the number of clean reps you could still have done when you ended a set. RPE for lifting rates the same set from 1 to 10, and from RPE 7 upwards each step is one rep left, so RPE = 10 − RIR: RPE 8 means about two reps left, and a program written in one converts exactly into the other.

Rate each working set right after the last rep, compare it with the RIR your program asks for, and change the weight when you are clearly off. Expect to misjudge by about a rep, usually by thinking you had fewer reps left than you did.

The RPE scale for lifting

The reps-in-reserve scale published by Zourdos and colleagues in 2016, which is what strength programs mean by RPE.

RPEReps left (RIR)What it means
100Maximum effort: you could not have done another rep.
91One rep left.
82Two reps left.
73Three reps left.
5–64–6Four to six reps left.
3–4ManyLight effort, such as an early warm-up set.
1–2ManyLittle to no effort.

From RPE 7 upwards, where working sets are rated, the conversion is RIR = 10 − RPE. A program that says 3 × 5 at RPE 8 asks for the same sets as 3 × 5 at RIR 2. Below RPE 7 the steps widen, as the table shows.

Many programs also use half points. By the same arithmetic, RPE 8.5 is one or two reps left and RPE 9.5 is somewhere between none and one. Use them only once whole numbers feel reliable.

Not the Borg scale

Search for an RPE scale and you will often find the Borg scale, created by the Swedish psychologist Gunnar Borg. Its best-known version runs from 6 to 20 and rates how hard your whole body is working, which is why it is used in endurance training, exercise testing and healthcare. The lifting scale is a different and much newer scale that counts reps left in one set.

ScaleRangeWhat you rateUsed for
Borg RPE6–20How hard the whole body is working, breathing includedEndurance training, exercise tests, healthcare
Borg CR100–10The strength of one sensation, such as breathlessness or effortHealthcare, workplace and research
RPE for lifting (reps in reserve)1–10How many reps you had left in one setStrength training

A number above 10 is Borg. If a program writes RPE 8 next to sets and reps, it means two reps left.

RIR vs RPE: what is the difference?

On the lifting scale they are one measurement written two ways: RPE 8 and RIR 2 describe the same set. The difference is in how the question feels when you ask it.

RIR asks you to count: how many more reps could I have done with the same technique? Counting is concrete, which makes RIR the easier one to start with, and it is how most research on muscle growth describes how close to failure a set went.

RPE asks you to rate: how hard was that set, out of ten? It came to lifting through powerlifting coaching, and in 2016 Zourdos and colleagues published and tested a version tied to reps in reserve. Lifters who prefer it point to two things: half points near the top, which suit heavy singles at RPE 8 or 9, and charts that pair each RPE and rep count with a percentage of the 1RM, so a heavy set gives an estimated max. Helms and colleagues print such a chart and warn that it is a guide, not an exact conversion.

Use whichever your program is written in. If you write your own, RIR is simpler to read in the gym. Nothing is lost either way, because the conversion is exact.

How to rate a set

  1. Rate right after the last rep, before you rest. A minute later the set already feels easier than it was.
  2. Rate working sets, not warm-ups. The scale is most useful from RPE 7 upwards, three reps left or fewer.
  3. Count only reps you could have done with the same technique and range of motion. A grinding rep that would break your form is not in reserve.
  4. Use whole numbers until you can tell two reps left from three. Then add half points if your program uses them.
  5. Write the number next to the weight and reps, so you can compare it the next time you do the exercise.

How accurate is your estimate?

Close, but not exact. A 2022 meta-analysis of 12 studies with 414 participants found that people underestimated how many reps they had left by about one rep on average (0.95). Estimates were better in sets of 12 reps or fewer, in later sets of an exercise, and slightly better the closer the set came to failure.

Experience helps less than you might think. In the squat study that introduced the scale, experienced lifters rated a true 1RM 9.8 on average against 9.0 for novices. Yet the meta-analysis found no effect of training status, and in a six-week bench press study, trained men did not get significantly more accurate.

So check yourself now and then. Call your RIR at the rep where you would normally stop, then keep going in the same set until you cannot do another clean rep: if you called RIR 2 after 8 reps, you should reach about 10. Do it only where failing is safe: machines, dumbbells, or a barbell with safety arms set. Helms and colleagues suggest that newer lifters record their RIR without basing weights on it until their estimates hold.

Use RIR to choose the weight

Example: a Prescription of 3 sets of 8–12 reps at RIR 2.

The number becomes useful when it decides the weight. Say your program asks for 3 × 8–12 at RIR 2 in the goblet squat and you start at 20 kg:

SetWeightRepsReps left (RIR)What you do next
Set 120 kg124Four reps left at the top of the range: too light. Add weight.
Set 224 kg102On target. Keep the weight.
Set 324 kg91One rep closer to failure as fatigue builds. Normal: keep the weight.

Next time, start at 24 kg. When every set reaches 12 reps with about two still in reserve, add the smallest step you can and work back up through the range.

If a set lands two or more reps away from the target, change the weight for the next set rather than waiting for the next workout. If you cannot reach the bottom of the range at the target, the weight is too heavy for today.

How close to failure should you train?

For muscle growth, a 2023 meta-analysis of 15 studies found at most a trivial advantage for sets taken to failure, and no clear advantage when failure meant the point where another rep could not be completed. A 2024 series of meta-regressions found growth rising as sets ended closer to failure, while strength gains were similar across a wide range of reps in reserve.

That leaves room. Helms and colleagues suggest two to four reps in reserve on the main lifts, zero to two on other exercises for muscle growth, and sets to failure only on low-risk isolation exercises. Strengthara's ready-made programs sit in the same range: RIR 3 on the heavy 5 × 5 lifts, 2 on most exercises and 1 on small isolation exercises.

Common questions

Is RPE 8 always two reps left?

On the lifting scale, yes, by definition. What varies is your estimate: an RPE 8 you thought was two reps left might really have been one or three, which is why it pays to check yourself now and then.

Should beginners use RIR or RPE?

RIR, because counting reps is easier than rating effort. In your first months, stopping two or three reps short of failure on the main lifts is enough. The exact number matters less than stopping before your form breaks.

Can I convert an RPE program to RIR?

Yes: subtract the RPE from 10. RPE 7 is RIR 3 and RPE 9 is RIR 1. A half point such as RPE 8.5 becomes one or two reps left. Below RPE 7 programs rarely prescribe sets, and the scale's steps there are wider.

Does RIR 0 mean training to failure?

RIR 0 means you could not have done another clean rep. Failure in the strict sense is trying another rep and missing it. You can reach RIR 0 without missing a rep. On heavy barbell lifts without safety arms, stop at RIR 0 or earlier rather than attempting a rep you might miss.

RIR in Strengthara

A Prescription in Strengthara gives sets, reps and, for most exercises, reps in reserve, never a weight. In a Session you see the RIR target where the Prescription has one and Last time, the weight and reps you did the last time, and you choose the weight yourself.

Strengthara does not calculate your next weight and does not record an RIR rating for each set. The rating is yours to make as you lift.

Method

Checked

We read the studies that introduced and tested the reps-in-reserve RPE scale, the research on how accurately lifters predict reps left, and the meta-analyses on training close to failure. The scale table follows Zourdos et al. (2016) as reprinted by Helms et al. (2016); the explanations are our own words. The RIR values of Strengthara's programs come from its program catalogue.

Most of the studies tested young, trained adults on a few barbell and machine exercises, and their results vary. Treat the numbers as a guide to calibrate against, not a measurement.

Sources

  1. Zourdos MC et al. (2016). Novel Resistance Training–Specific Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale Measuring Repetitions in Reserve. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(1), 267–275. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001049

    NSCA · PubMedAccessed

  2. Helms ER, Cronin J, Storey A, Zourdos MC (2016). Application of the Repetitions in Reserve-Based Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale for Resistance Training. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 38(4), 42–49. doi:10.1519/SSC.0000000000000218

    NSCA · PubMed CentralAccessed

  3. Borg GA (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 14(5), 377–381. doi:10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012

    ACSM · PubMedAccessed

  4. Williams N (2017). The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale. Occupational Medicine, 67(5), 404–405. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqx063

    Oxford University PressAccessed

  5. Halperin I et al. (2022). Accuracy in Predicting Repetitions to Task Failure in Resistance Exercise: A Scoping Review and Exploratory Meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 52(2), 377–390. doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01559-x

    Springer · PubMedAccessed

  6. Remmert JF et al. (2023). Changes in Intraset Repetitions in Reserve Prediction Accuracy During Six Weeks of Bench Press Training in Trained Men. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 130(5), 2139–2160. doi:10.1177/00315125231189098

    SAGE · PubMedAccessed

  7. Refalo MC et al. (2023). Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 53(3), 649–665. doi:10.1007/s40279-022-01784-y

    Springer · PubMed CentralAccessed

  8. Robinson ZP et al. (2024). Exploring the Dose–Response Relationship Between Estimated Resistance Training Proximity to Failure, Strength Gain, and Muscle Hypertrophy: A Series of Meta-Regressions. Sports Medicine, 54(9), 2209–2231. doi:10.1007/s40279-024-02069-2

    Springer · PubMedAccessed